May 23, 2013

Grants for research on blended learning – from a lecture capture company

Listen with webReader

Nagel, D. (2013) Grants support research into blended, distance learning Campus Technology, January 7

Echo360, a vendor of a range of educational technology, including lecture capture technology, has announced the first six winners of grants for researching teaching practices involving the use of technology, including flipped classrooms and blended learning. They include four universities in the USA, and one each in Australia (Curtin) and New Zealand (Canterbury). Each grant is worth $10,000.

Additional information about the grants, as well as PDFs of the proposals submitted by the individual winners, can be found on Echo360′s site.

Comment

I have mixed feelings about this. First, it’s good that money is going into research in this area. We need to develop and evaluate a range of models for blended and hybrid learning.

However, there are models that could be developed that are not based on lecture capture. Who is willing to fund independent research that is not tied to a particular commercial product?

Surely this is the role of public national research councils, who in the past have been very slow to fund research into online learning. It’s more than time now for government-funded research councils to put significant money into research in online learning. However, in several countries these research councils have had their budgets decimated, and they tend to be dominated by mainstream academics with no interest in research online learning.

This makes it all the more incumbent on institutions that do move towards a mixed model of delivery to ensure that there are independent and well designed evaluations in place, with a strategy for dissemination to a wider public.

Use of analytics for early intervention with ‘at-risk’ students

Listen with webReader

© Bowen Island Community School

Grush, M. (2011) Monitoring the PACE of Student Learning: Analytics at Rio Salado College Campus Technology, December 14

This article looks at the use of learning analytics at Rio Salado College, Arizona, where all 41,000 students take online courses. It has instituted a Progress and Course Engagement (PACE) system for automated tracking of student progress–with intervention as needed. They found that there are three main predictors of success:

  • the frequency of a student logging into a course;
  • site engagement–whether they read or engage with the course materials online and do practice exercises and so forth; and
  • how many points they are getting on their assignments.

They claim they can predict, after the first week of a course, with 70 percent accuracy, whether any given student will complete the course successfully (with a grade of “C” or better). The PACE system enables them to identify the level of risk for every student in a course, which helps to focus instructor, advisor, and other institutional resources on quickly helping the ones who are most at risk.

There is a good deal more in the article about the potential of learning analytics in post-secondary education.

 

Developing an institutional strategy for mobile learning: Northeastern University

Listen with webReader

© WiredEducator, 2011

Grush, M. (2011) Creating Your Institution’s Mobile Learning Strategy Campus Technology, December 7

If you can put up with the really irritating web advertising in this online journal, this article provides a useful description of Northeastern University‘s mobile learning strategy. The main message: link mobile learning to the broader academic goals and priorities (such as, in Northeastern’s case, its focus on experiential learning.) It’s mainly about integrating the iPad into more traditional teaching.

The article also provide useful links to other institutions’ mobile strategies, e.g. Abilene Christian, Duke, Carnegie Mellon, Tufts and Stanford. If you don’t have an institutional strategy yet, these provide some good ‘benchmarks’ to follow.

See also Mobile Learning at Northeastern, their web site on mobile learning.

Key mobile strategy issues

Listen with webReader

Mobile learning centre Algonquin College, Ontario

Fuhrman, T. (2011) Mobile strategy or moving target?, Campus Technology, November 1

This paper looks at five issues that need to be considered when developing a mobile strategy for university and college campuses, based on experience from Columbus State University and University of Wisconsin-Madison:

1. Develop own mobile website, apps, or both?

2. Inhouse, outsource or customize?

3. Cross-platform development

4. Costs

5. Security.

Since the answers all end up being: ‘It all depends’, you need to read the article for the answers.

Comment

From this and a number of other articles, campus mobile strategy (like many other technology innovations) seems to be driven primarily by student administrative and student service agendas, rather than by teaching and learning applications. Nothing wrong with using mobile for student services, of course, but again there is a danger that if there is not enough experimentation on the teaching side, key decisions that do not always support teaching applications will be made that will be difficult to reverse later on.

I just wish there was as much news and literature on strategies for the mobile learning side. However, I will shortly be reviewing a new book on mLearning that should answer some of these questions:

Quinn, Clark, N. (2012) The Mobile Academy: mLearning for Higher Education San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/John Wiley

 

Report on three years of mobile learning at Abilene Christian University

Listen with webReader

Schaffhauser, D. (2011) Mobile Initiatives ‘Breaking Down the Walls of the Classroom’ at Abilene Christian U Campus Technology, October 24

This article summarizes some of the conclusions from Abilene Christian University’s report on three years of using iPods, iPhone and iPads. Over 80% of faculty and students use mobile learning now in their studies.

Director of Educational Innovation Bill Rankin comments:

we’re going to see the classroom space becoming less and less about the place where people discover information and more and more a space for collaboration for stuff I’ve discovered or made elsewhere. The elsewhere–the real world experiences–become my primary classrooms, which is going to have massive implications on how we design spaces, how much space we decide we need, and on what we do on scheduling and courses.

All I can say is ‘At last – someone’s got it!’ Well done, ACU.