“I’m just a committed and even stubborn person who wants to see every child getting quality education”
Malala Yousafzai’s Nobel Prize speech, 2014
This is the first of five posts on ‘open-ness’ in education for my online open textbook, Teaching in a Digital Age, covering:
- open education, open access and open universities (this post)
- open educational resources
- open textbooks, open research and open data
- the implications of ‘open’ for course and program design
- a scenario for a post-graduate program based on an approach to ‘open’ design.
Once again, I’m saving the best until the end!
In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in open education, mainly related to open educational resources and MOOCs. Although in themselves OER and MOOCs are important developments, they tend to cloud other developments in open education that are likely have even more impact on education as a whole.
It is therefore necessary to step back a little to get a broader understanding of open education. This will help us better understand the significance of these and other developments in open education, and their likely impact on teaching and learning now and in the future.
Open education as a concept
Open education can take a number of forms:
- education for all: free or very low cost school, college or university education available to everyone within a particular jurisdiction, usually funded primarily through the state;
- open access to programs that lead to full, recognised qualifications. These are offered by national open universities or more recently by the OERu;
- open access to courses or programs that are not for formal credit, although it may be possible to acquire badges or certificates for successful completion. MOOCs are a good example;
- open educational resources that instructors or learners can use for free. MIT’s OpenCourseware, which provides free online downloads of MIT’s video recorded lectures and support material, is one example;
- open textbooks, online textbooks that are free for students to use;
- open research, whereby research papers are made available online for free downloading;
- open data, that is, data open to anyone to use, reuse, and redistribute, subject only, at most, to the requirement to attribute and share.
Each of these developments is discussed in more detail below, except for MOOCs, which are discussed extensively in Chapter 7.
Education for all – except higher education
Open education is primarily a goal, or an educational policy. An essential characteristic of open education is the removal of barriers to learning. This means no prior qualifications to study, no discrimination by gender, age or religion, affordability for everyone, and for students with disabilities, a determined effort to provide education in a suitable form that overcomes the disability (for example, audio recordings for students who are visually impaired). Ideally, no-one should be denied access to an open educational program. Thus open learning must be scalable as well as flexible.
State-funded public education is the most extensive and widespread form of open education. For example, the British government passed the 1870 Education Act that set the framework for schooling of all children between the ages of 5 and 13 in England and Wales. Although there were some fees to be paid by parents, the Act established the principle that education would be paid for mainly through taxes and no child would be excluded for financial reasons. Schools would be administered by elected local school boards.
Over time, access to publicly funded education in most economically developed countries has been widened to include all children up to the age of 18. UNESCO’s Education for All (EFA) movement is a global commitment to provide quality basic education for all children, youth and adults, supported, at least in principle, by 164 national governments. Nevertheless today there are still many millions of ‘out-of-school’ children worldwide.
Access to post-secondary or higher education though has been more limited, partly on financial grounds, but also in terms of ‘merit’. Universities have required those applying for university to meet academic standards determined by prior success in school examinations or institutional entry exams. This has enabled elite universities in particular to be highly selective.
However, after the Second World War, the demand for an educated population, both for social and economic reasons, in most economically advanced countries resulted in the gradual expansion of universities and post-secondary education in general. In most OECD countries, roughly 35-60 per cent of an age cohort will go on to some form of post-secondary education.
Especially in a digital age, there is an increasing demand for highly qualified workers, and post-secondary education is a necessary doorway to most of the best jobs. Therefore there is increasing pressure for full and free open access to post-secondary, higher or tertiary education.
However, as we saw in Chapter 1, the cost of widening access to ever increasing numbers results in increased financial pressure on governments and taxpayers. Following the financial crisis of 2008, many states in the USA found themselves in severe financial difficulties, which resulted in substantial cuts to the public education system. Thus solutions that enable increased access without a proportionate increase in funding are almost desperately being sought by governments and institutions. It is against this background that the recent interest in open education should be framed.
As a result, open is increasingly (and perhaps misleadingly) being associated with ‘free’. While the use of open materials may be free to the end user (learners), there are real costs in creating and distributing open education, and supporting learners, which has to be covered in some way. Thus a sustainable and adequate system of publicly funded education is still the best way to ensure access to quality education for all. Other forms of open education are steps towards achieving fully open access to higher education.
Open access in higher education
In the 1970s and 1980s, there was a rapid growth in the number of open universities that required no or minimal prior qualifications for entry. In the United Kingdom, for instance, less than 10 per cent of students leaving secondary education in 1969 went on to university. This was when the British government established the Open University, a distance teaching university open to all, using a combination of specially designed printed texts, and broadcast television and radio, with one week residential summer schools on traditional university campuses for the foundation courses (Perry, 1976).
The Open University started in 1971 with 25,000 students in the initial entry intake, and now has over 200,000 registered students. It has been consistently ranked by government quality assurance agencies in the top ten U.K. universities for teaching, and in the top 30 for research, and number one for student satisfaction (out of over 180). It currently has over 200,000 registered students. However, it can no longer cover the full cost of its operation from government grants and there is now a range of different fees to be paid.
There are now nearly 100 publicly funded open universities around the world, including Canada (Athabasca University and Téluq). These open universities are often very large. The Open University of China has over one million enrolled undergraduate students and 2.4 million junior high school students, Anadolou Open University in Turkey has over 1.2 million enrolled undergraduate students, the Open University of Indonesia (Universitas Terbuka) almost half a million, and the University of South Africa 350,000. These large, degree awarding national open universities provide an invaluable service to millions of students who otherwise would have no access to higher education (see Daniel, 1998, for a good overview). It should be noted however that there is no publicly funded open university in the USA, which is one reason why MOOCs have received so much attention there.
As well as the national open universities, which usually offer their own degrees, there is also the OERu, which is basically an international consortium of mainly British Commonwealth and U.S. universities and colleges offering open access courses that enable learners either to acquire full credit for transfer into one of the partner universities or to build towards a full degree, offered by the university from which most credits have been acquired. Students pay a fee for assessment.
10.7.2 Limitations of open access education
Open, distance, flexible and online learning are rarely found in their ‘purest’ forms. No teaching system is completely open (minimum levels of literacy are required, for instance). Thus there are always degrees of open-ness.
Open-ness has particular implications for the use of technology. If no-one is to be denied access, then technologies that are available to everyone need to be used. If an institution is deliberately selective in its students, it has more flexibility with regard to choice of technology for distance education. It can for instance require all students who wish to take an online or blended course to have their own computer and Internet access. It cannot do that if its mandate is to be open to all students. Truly open universities then will always be behind the leading edge of educational applications of technology.
Despite the success of many open universities, open universities often lack the status of a campus-based institution. Their degree completion rates are often very low (the U.K. OU’s degree completion rate is 22 per cent – Woodley and Simpson, 2014 – but nevertheless still higher for whole degree programs than for most single MOOC courses). And as noted previously, there are no comparable publicly funded open universities in the USA (the Western Governors’ University is the most similar), although private, for-profit universities such as the University of Phoenix fill a similar niche in the market.
Lastly, some of the open universities have been around for more than 40 years and have not always quickly adapted to changes in technology, partly because of their large size and their substantial prior investment in older technologies such as print and broadcasting, and partly because they do not wish to deny access to students without the latest technology. Thus they are now increasingly challenged by both an explosion in access to conventional universities, which has taken up some of their market, and new developments such as MOOCs and open educational resources, which are the topic of the next section.
This part is fairly descriptive, but still necessary, I believe. However, here are some questions I have:
- Open education is a huge topic. Have I done it justice in the space available – given that I have separate sections on other aspects such as OERs and open textbooks?
- Do you think it is necessary to provide the context of ‘education for all’ and ‘open universities’ when discussing approaches to open-ness today? Or is all this now irrelevant? (I have to say this is the impression I’m sometimes given by advocates of OER and MOOCs).
- I clearly have a bias towards adequate, publicly funded education as the best way to increase access and open-ness. Do I push this too much, or not enough?
- Is there a future for open universities?
- Making sense of open educational resources
Integrating open textbooks, open research and open data into teaching
The implications of ‘open’ for course and program design: towards a paradigm shift
Daniel, J. (1998) Mega-Universities and Knowledge Media: Technology Strategies for Higher Education. London: Kogan Page
Perry, W. (1976) The Open University Milton Keynes: Open University Press
Woodley, A. and Simpson, O. (2014) ‘Student drop-out: the elephant in the room’ in Zawacki-Richter, O. and Anderson, T. (eds.) (2014) Online Distance Education: Towards a Research Agenda Athabasca AB: AU Press, pp. 508
Thanks for a great article. I believe education should available for everyone. More educated people = comfortable living for everyone = no crime. Fortunately, there are many online courses and even “universities” that can provide professional education to those who cannot pay for it.
Thanks for this great summary. I’m doing some graduate work with a focus on OER, and, in terms of the limitations you write about, I wonder about the limitations inherent in the skill levels that the students bring with them to open education. In my experiences, students come to open, online coursework with writing, reading, and study skills that stand in the way of their success. As you note, no education system is completely open with regard to literacy and skill development, but I wonder if systems could be made more open by using more OERs to develop basic education skills.
Very nice thoughts you have shared but if we provide education at a low cost then from the education association get fund for running their system. Professors who spent their time in forming new knowledge resource from where they get payment according to their livelihood it might disturb the balance of education industry it also will impact on the whole economy of a particular country.
Many thanks for this very inspiring summary, Tony. Please, see my review of your article based on the questions you asked below:
Tony Bates had done justice in his analysis of Open Education. Interestingly, he separates the concept of open education from OERs and MOOCs.
I think it is necessary to bring in the context of education-for-all into the discussion of open universities when discussing openness. One reason is because open universities were established to provide education for the masses.
Tony Bates has a clear bias for adequate publicly funded education. This bias is obvious in the article but he makes a good argument for his position.
The issues identified by Bates in his article on Open Education clearly indicates that there is a future for open universities, OERs and MOOCs.
Thanks, Gospel – I really appreciate your comments!
This is a good article and undoubtedly raises some food for thought questions. It is also worth noting that open learning is not open as such because there are still some apparent barriers as noted in the article. I am just wandering how these barriers can be overcome considering that education is expensive as one goes higher in it. There are more returns for the individual and as such education whether open or otherwise should be paid for. What do you think? Well, it is just a thought.
Good point, Elias.
There will always be barriers for some people to a better education. Usually it’s financial, but there can be other barriers, for instance, lack of knowledge or information about possibilities, such as scholarships or grants. Back in the 1950s I did not go to university for two years because I didn’t realise I had the necessary high school qualifications for many good universities and was also eligible for state funding – nobody told me that until I was 20 (I was the first person from my family ever to go to university). Indeed I sometimes think that those promoting OER forget that open-ness is not just about materials or resources but also about access to information and services.
Another aspect that does not often get enough consideration is quality. Getting access to an institution – or taking an online course – is no guarantee of success in life, especially if the institution does not support those students who need extra support or if the courses have been badly designed to save money (and hence ‘open’ access.) That’s a con.
Life for many is not fair, especially for those who are poor or lack power and influence.That’s why well funded, high quality public education is so essential. It’s one of the few guaranteed ways to improve the chances of those who are otherwise disadvantaged. Quality, free or low cost public education for all is the best open education there is – and that could be on-campus or online.