Share or Save arrow3 Responses
  1. Miksa
    February 6, 2012 - 10:37 pm

    Hi Tony ..
    As an asynchronous online K12 educator I find the data driven policies clash with the reality of online students. SOME of my students struggle or find the f2f too slow. Sometimes the policy of taking a full course load to so the school qualifies for fte funding is just an added stress. Some students just want to focus on one thing at a time. They don’t want to multitask and switch subjects. We sometimes ask kids to do things under circumstances where most adults would take a medical leave. They are pursuing online education because their learning needs are not met in face-to-face. Sometimes data driven policies fail to personalize the learning environment so a student can be more successful, particularly if the big data focused on a different definitions of success. (ie. percentile gains as opposed to passing rates and comparable averages of DL to f2f). If online learning or its hybrids are to be ‘revolutionary’ then new tools will need to be developed to measure this new indicators of ‘success’. The logic for FTE is antiquated. Even if a child focuses on one course, WE (the student and I) still put in the same amount of time in a course. It isn’t the number of months but it is the number of hours and some kids need more time and some need less.

    Unfortunately, the alternative currently under the microscope is block funding and funding based on course completion. That creates another number driven system where online class sizes will be based on completion rates and not allow for ballooning enrollments and the need to have more teachers. The result will be courses that are designed for factory models with scrom and self-marking type lower level thinking questions that allow online teachers to have a manageable work load (marking, communication, phone calls, feedback, and perhaps, course development). In BC, there is no class size limit for online learning but we have year round enrollment (not cohort) and funding snapshots. Often, larger class sizes are rationalized because the students are not active. My research in my Masters suggested that building relationships is key for students’ success and ironically, the data drives does not allow for that time or that measure. The data driven policies for DL may adversely affect a system that for some students are the only viable alternative.

    It is late.. I shouldn’t rant at this hour..

    • Tony Bates
      February 7, 2012 - 10:29 am

      Thanks for a great post, Miksa – please DO rant like this!

      I don’t normally cover k-12 online learning, but I’ve noted some disturbing developments recently in online learning in BC schools, such as classroom teaching notes being used as the basis for an online course and when this fails, hiring a designer to make it work in an online environment, and overloading online classes with too many students for an instructor to manage comfortably. What started as a drive to improve access for students and as an alternative to classroom teaching seems to have morphed into a money-saving initiative by the Ministry. However, I’m not close enough to the action to know whether or not this is the reality.

      In the meantime, I fully agree with you that the secret of success in online learning is relationship building with and between the students, and that then does become a numbers game.

  2. [...] factors that influence student performance, then using the results to modify or change practice.Via Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]

Leave a Reply

Mobile Theme