As I announced in an earlier post, I’m planning to explore the idea of writing and publishing an open textbook, on the topic of teaching in a digital age. I set out the reasons why in another earlier post.
Today I want to set out what my vision is for this open textbook. I want to do this now, before I start, as a sort of checklist or rubric against which to judge the final product. However, before I go any further, I want to point out that this is a personal vision for what I want to do. There are innumerable alternative visions one could quite legitimately have for an open textbook that would be quite different from mine. So here goes:
- the book is about different approaches to teaching in a digital age, with practical guidance
- the book is aimed mainly at faculty and instructors in colleges and universities, but designed in a way that will also appeal to many in the k-12 sector, and also to senior administrators
- it will draw on a wide body of research and experience in the use of technology for teaching in post-secondary education and my own experiences in teaching online
- I will try to get selected colleagues and experts in the field to participate/help, if they will accept my overall editing role
- the drafts will be ‘tested’ openly before a final, formal peer review of the whole book
- the first complete version of the book will be ready by December 2014
- the book itself will be a model for open textbook publishing, incorporating many of the design principles of ‘good teaching’ – such as active and social learning, use of video and audio, crowd-sourcing, remixing and adaptation – within the open text format, as far as I can stretch it with existing technologies and services
- it will be preferably free, but certainly at as low a cost as possible to those who want to read it, and easily accessible in whole or in parts. The goal is zero or low cost within financial sustainability (i.e. all necessary costs are recovered in some way, except my time, which will be free – but tracked!)
- the book will be dynamic, changing over time as the world around it changes; this means finding a way to keep the text going even after I have gone
I will treat it as an R&D project, where I track and evaluate obstacles, solutions, actual costs, partners/helpers/resources, resulting in a short guide of what to do and what not to do when writing an open textbook, all shared on an ongoing basis through this blog.
Your input/comments welcomed
How does this compare with your vision (or understanding) of an open text-book? What have I missed? Is there something in the vision I should drop right now!
In about a couple of weeks, I’ll produce my first draft of a rough proposal for the content of the book, which will give readers of this blog more to chew on than ‘an airy-fairy, worse than Mary’ vision statement, as one of my British friends would say.