My experience of online learning in 2017
2017 was a very interesting year for me, if not for online learning as a whole. I have a very different interface with online learning these days from most people, more that of an observer than as a participant, which has both advantages and disadvantages, but it does give me a somewhat wider perspective, so first, here’s what I did, then second what I learned from my experience.
What I did in 2017
I had three main avenues into online learning in 2017:
- my online open textbook, Teaching in a Digital Age. Although published in 2015, it is still going strong and has generated several activities. The English version has been downloaded over 60,000 times since it was published in April, 2015, and is now translated into French, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, Vietnamese and the first half into Turkish (the second half should be completed soon), with further translations into Farsi, Arabic, Hebrew and Japanese under way, all by volunteer translators. The book continues to result in keynotes and workshops. This year I gave ‘physical’ keynotes in Barcelona, Toronto, Halifax, Pennsylvania, Windsor Castle (UK), and a webinar to South Australia. I also did several Contact North webinars on topics from the book. These activities allowed me to interact directly with instructors and course designers engaged in online learning;
- Contact North’s Pockets of Innovation gave me the privilege of personally interviewing instructors doing innovative teaching using learning technologies in universities and colleges in British Columbia, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland. In all I interviewed 23 instructors in 16 different institutions. More importantly I could see exactly what they were doing in context. However, this was still a small proportion of the more than 180 cases reported to date by Contact North;
- leading the research team for the national survey of online and distance learning in Canadian post-secondary institutions allowed me to get the ‘big picture’ of online developments in Canadian universities and colleges. Also having to raise the funding for this project ($165,000 in total) brought me into contact with government agencies engaged with online learning (eCampuses mainly), but also national organisations such as CICAN and Universities Canada, and commercial sponsors such as Pearson and D2L, giving me yet another perspective on agencies engaged with online learning.
So what did I learn from all this in 2017?
A big leap forward for online learning in Canada in 2017
Complacency is dangerous, but Canada did pretty well in online learning in 2017:
- most universities and colleges in Canada do at least some fully online and distance courses, enabling wider access in almost every province and territory;
- enrolments in fully online learning or distance courses are increasing at a rate of 10%-15% per annum (although with considerable provincial variation);
- probably about 15% of all post-secondary teaching in Canada is now fully online;
- more and more instructors are integrating online learning into their classroom or campus-based teaching;
- most Canadian post-secondary institutions see online learning as critically important for their future;
- a good deal of innovation in teaching is going on at the individual instructor level;
- a few provincial governments are solidly supporting online learning and their policies are directly resulting in more digital learning.
Innovation ain’t what you think it is
Innovation in teaching is much more than just using advanced technologies for the first time – and sometimes much less. I was struck in particular about several things from the Pockets of Innovation interviews:
- most instructors are using new technology (or at least technology new to them) to help with a particular teaching problem or challenge, whether it’s because students don’t come to lectures because of bad weather, or because there are not enough models or samples for every student in the class to spend enough time with, or because students are dropping out of a program because the courses are not properly sequenced or coherent. Technology is best used when it helps solve an actual teaching problem;
- often though the technology is not enough on its own; it has to be combined with an appropriate change in teaching method or policy that the technology supports or enhances;
- successful innovation is happening mainly from the bottom up; this is because individual instructors are in the best position to judge the learning context, the learning needs, and which of the zillion new apps and technologies available is the one most likely to fit the situation;
- the corollary is that institutional or government policies can encourage innovation but cannot predict what it will be: innovation strategy should focus on encouraging risk-taking and rewarding instructors who innovate successfully (i.e. by getting better learning outcomes) rather than privileging particular technologies or even teaching approaches (such as competency-based or experiential learning, for instance, no matter how worthy they are in their own right);
- most successful teaching innovations are based on easily available and somewhat familiar technologies, such as mobile phones and web conferencing, rather than on ‘state-of-the art’ technologies such as virtual reality or AI;
- government policy and funding (or lack of it) does make a difference; money talks as can be seen by the impact of government funding for online course development in Ontario and for open educational resources and open text books in British Columbia;
- few institutions or even provincial governments have a meaningful strategy for supporting innovation in teaching, especially for diffusing innovation throughout an institution or system; as a result innovative teaching still remains in pockets rather than transforming institutions or systems.
There’s a long way to go with open educational resources
OER continue to be a hard sell for most Canadian instructors, despite strong commitment from at least two governments of large provinces. This was evident from both the Pockets of Innovation and the national survey.
This is a topic on its own, but having talked to instructors and seen how they think about teaching, here are my two cents’ worth of thoughts on why OER continue to develop much more slowly than they should:
- when OER are being promoted, it often comes across as a cult or an ideology rather than a solution to an instructor’s teaching problem. Show instructors how OER can save them time or money. Show them how OER can best be integrated into teaching specific subjects or topics and show the teaching benefits over using commercial products (unfortunately most instructors care less about saving money for students than making their own lives easier – strange that, isn’t it?);
- the main advantage of expensive commercial textbooks is all the supplementary materials they come with that make life easier for an instructor and students, such as worked examples or solutions, test questions and answers, and automated marking; just publishing an open textbook without linking it to supporting OER doesn’t cut it, but at the moment OER and open textbooks are often developed independently – they need to be better integrated;
- stop thinking of OER as something different from everything else on the Internet; all open content has value, whether it is specifically designed for educational purposes or not; this means coming up with course design models that exploit open content for the purpose of developing 21st century skills such as knowledge management, analysis of source reliability, etc.
- at the same time, if an object is meant to be educational, design it better – too many OER are poorly designed in media terms and are not clearly linked to specific learning outcomes; this means scaling up OER production so that it is more easily shareable. Instead of funding individual instructors to create subject-specific OER, bring all the statistics instructors together, for instance, with instructional designers and media producers, first to check what’s already available and what its limitations are, then to produce better, high quality OER for statistics that everyone can use.
- try to get experienced faculty who are nearing the end of their careers to write an open textbook as a legacy project, pulling together all their knowledge and experience over their whole career; this is likely to result in innovative, ‘breakthrough’ open textbooks rather than just providing an open version of existing textbooks, and may lead more importantly to revised and more appropriate curricula.
Instructor training in teaching remains a huge problem
One of the findings from my Pocket of Innovation interviews was that less than half the instructors based their innovation on a theory of learning or a change of teaching method to produce different outcomes, such as skills development. Without a grounding in pedagogy and a knowledge of the research into how people learn, it is impossible for most instructors to see the real potential of digital technology for improving their teaching. We still rely too much on instructional designers backstopping faculty who don’t know how to teach effectively.
Even when fully online learning is only 15% of all teaching, it has been difficult to provide adequate instructional design support. When 80-90% of instructors have the potential to integrate technology into their classroom teaching the current model of faculty support will not be feasible.
One solution to this is to provide instructors with ‘on-demand’ online resources when they need them. For instance:
- UBC’s Centre for Teaching, Learning and Technology has a wiki on how to select technology based on the SECTIONs model;
- UBC’s Arts Faculty has a site called ‘Ideas and Strategies for Using Video in the Classroom‘;
- Bruno Poellhuber at the Université de Montréal has developed a web-based expert system for designing instructional scenarios.
However useful though such on-demand tools may be, they do not replace the need for some basic grounding in pedagogical principles, which is now absolutely essential if technology is to be used well in teaching.
Well, looking into 2018 is another blog post, but of one thing I am certain: I won’t be working as hard next year as I did in 2017.
I really enjoyed everything I did, but I cannot go on doing the long-distance travel, which exhausts me.
So I wish you all a great holiday season, so that you can come back refreshed for another interesting year in what surely is one of the most exciting and satisfying areas to be working in these days.
Dear Tony, Thank you for sharing your insights. These are all golden nuggets of insights from praxis, merging your observations of the experiences of many with your strong pedagogical knowledge. I especially want to thank you for your observation about the limits of availability of instructional designers and the need to mainstream faculty abilities. As education consultant in curriculum, course and instructional design and resource development, the development of academics is the other half of a very big coin, not separate from it. The need is great. Blended learning is uniquely different and in assisting many to move from correspondence to blended I am astounded as to how much work is involved in blending the DE mode. The jump to e- or online learning is an even bigger mental gap. I am available to help in projects from here in South Africa.
It is nice to hear from you again .
I have known you for about 15 years now .
We are pioneers in online .
Now 1 thing is really good ( somehow bad though ) 8.000 online courses by 800 top schools of the world .
Some of them are really good .MOOCs by Harvard, Stanford, Yale, MIT etc .
So I made use up the existing resources .
I have selected the best of best 40 courses for MBA in Finance from Stanford, Yale, Harvard etc .
I have allowed students to select 10 out of these 40 courses for an MBA degree .
When they get 10 courses and certificates from these 10 courses my UNIVERSITY provides an MBA Degree. FREE .
That is http://www.mguniversity2017.org
All administration is done by my university software .
No person is required . That is the beauty of it . So I appeal to 8 billion people of the world to get master degrees in
MBA concentrating in Finance
MBA concentrating in Marketing
Computer Science AI
Computer Scienc e Data Science
I will add some BA programs soon too .
Please come to our university get degrees, get courses from Harvard, Stanford, Yale .
There is no school in the world you can take courses from Harvard, Stanford, Yale, Princeton, MIT, Duke, Nortwestern, U of Chicago . 10 courses from ten university .
ALL FREE. BUT Courses are not easy. So take only 1 course per semester .